不同方法治疗前列腺增生症的效果观察
时间:2015-03-25 11:08 文章来源:http://www.lunwenbuluo.com 作者:王国良 点击次数:
[摘要] 目的 探讨不同方法治疗前列腺增生症的效果。 方法 将前列腺增生症患者80例采用双盲法分为治疗组与对照组,各40例,对照组采用经尿道前列腺电切术,治疗组采用经尿道等离子前列腺切除术。 结果 治疗组术中出血量少于对照组,术后尿管留置时间、术后住院时间均短于对照组(P<0.05);两组手术时间对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗组术后出血、感染、经尿道电切综合征等并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。 结论 相对于经尿道前列腺电切术,经尿道等离子前列腺切除术治疗前列腺增生症能减少手术创伤与术后并发症的发生,值得推广应用。
[关键词] 前列腺增生症;经尿道前列腺电切术;经尿道等离子前列腺切除术;并发症
[中图分类号] R697+.32 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2015)02(b)-0048-03
Effects observation of different methods in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
WANG Guo-liang
Department of Urology,People′s Hospital of Yunan County in Yunfu City of Guangdong Province,Yunan 527100,China
[Abstract] Objective To explore the effects of different methods in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods 80 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia accorded double-blind were divided into treatment group and control group with 40 patients,the transurethral resection of prostate was used in control group,the plasma kinetic transurethral resection of prostate was applied in treatment group. Results The blood loss in treatment group was less than that in control group,postoperative indwelling catheter time and postoperative hospital stay in treatment group was shorter than that in control group respectively(P<0.05).The operative time in two groups was compared,with no statistical difference(P>0.05).The incidence rate of complication(postoperative bleeding,infection,after transurethral resection syndrome)in treatment group was lower than that in control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with transurethral resection of prostate,plasma kinetic transurethral resection of prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia can reduce the incidence of surgical trauma and postoperative complication,is worthy of promotion and application.
[Key words] Benign prostatic hyperplasia;Transurethral resection of prostate;Plasma kinetic transurethral resection of prostate;Complication
前列腺增生症是老龄化社会中老年男性最常见的疾病之一,多伴发心、肺等其他脏器功能异常。随着人均寿命的延长,我国前列腺增生症患者越来越多[1]。虽然泌尿外科诊疗手段不断完善,前列腺增生症的治疗取得令人满意的效果,但是手术方法也需要不断进步[2]。经尿道前列腺电切术(transurethral resection of prostate,TURP)被认为是前列腺增生治疗的“金标准”,虽然有很好的治疗效果,但TURP的切割环细而光,与组织接触面积小,手术操作难度增加,可导致失血过多和经尿道电切综合征(transurethral resection syndrome,TURS)等[3-4]。随着医学技术的发展,经尿道等离子前列腺切除术(plasma kinetic transurethral resection of prostate,PKRP)被广泛应用[5]。本文主要探讨TURP与PKRP治疗前列腺增生症的效果。
1 资料与方法
1.1 一般资料
2010年8月~2014年2月选择在本院诊治的前列腺增生症患者80例,年龄34~79岁,平均(56.33±5.23)岁;病程1个月~4年,平均(1.33±0.67)年;术前超声体测体积为(55.67±4.29) ml;术前IPSS为(23.74±5.22)分。纳入标准:通过病史、查体、超声诊断良性前列腺增生;出现手术治疗指征;患者有手术意愿;年龄20~80岁;无绝对手术禁忌证。排除标准:合并心肝肾疾病;合并恶性肿瘤;合并精神疾病。采用双盲法分为治疗组与对照组,各40例,两组的年龄、病程、术前超声体测体积与IPSS对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性。
1.2 治疗方法
对照组:采用TURP,采用Wblf 24F电切镜,电凝功率60~80 W。采用连续硬膜外麻醉和(或)腰麻,患者取截石位。5、7点作标志沟后将腺体分割成两块,阻断5、7点处进入前列腺中叶的血供,彻底止血创面,进行腔内分割。从12点处切到包膜沿包膜切割形成分离沟,内侧为阻断血供的腺体组,切除左、右侧叶的腺体。彻底止血,冲洗,修整腺体、膀胱颈部、前列腺窝,洗出组织碎片,术毕。
治疗组:采用PKRP,前期处理同对照组,在5、7点处分别切除腺体形成两条标志沟,阻断5、7点处进入前列腺中叶的血供,进行腔内分割。以电切襻点切开精阜近端尿道黏膜,用电切袢逆推方式寻找增生腺体与外科包膜间隙,凝切血管断端及纤维条索,快速切除中叶止血。12点处切标志沟将剩余腺体分成两块,切开尿道黏膜,分离腺体到12点处,快速切除左侧叶腺体与右侧叶,后期处理同对照组。
- 论文部落提供核心期刊、国家级期刊、省级期刊、SCI期刊和EI期刊等咨询服务。
- 论文部落拥有一支经验丰富、高端专业的编辑团队,可帮助您指导各领域学术文章,您只需提出详细的论文写作要求和相关资料。
-
- 论文投稿客服QQ:
2863358778、
2316118108
-
- 论文投稿电话:15380085870
-
- 论文投稿邮箱:lunwenbuluo@126.com